↓ Skip to main content

Fund behavioral science like the frameworks we endorse: the case for increased funding of preliminary studies by the National Institutes of Health

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fund behavioral science like the frameworks we endorse: the case for increased funding of preliminary studies by the National Institutes of Health
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-01179-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Beets, Christopher Pfledderer, Lauren von Klinggraeff, Sarah Burkart, Bridget Armstrong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,612,825
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#65
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,455
of 429,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.