↓ Skip to main content

Widespread false gene gains caused by duplication errors in genome assemblies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Widespread false gene gains caused by duplication errors in genome assemblies
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13059-022-02764-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Byung June Ko, Chul Lee, Juwan Kim, Arang Rhie, Dong Ahn Yoo, Kerstin Howe, Jonathan Wood, Seoae Cho, Samara Brown, Giulio Formenti, Erich D. Jarvis, Heebal Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 27%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,602,894
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,080
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,155
of 436,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#37
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.