You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-1-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger P Hellens, Andrew C Allan, Ellen N Friel, Karen Bolitho, Karryn Grafton, Matthew D Templeton, Sakuntala Karunairetnam, Andrew P Gleave, William A Laing |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 502 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 150 | 28% |
| Researcher | 109 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 329 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 4 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 4 | <1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 91 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,722,996
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#276
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,327
of 154,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.