You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parental and household smoking and the increased risk of bronchitis, bronchiolitis and other lower respiratory infections in infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-12-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura L Jones, Ahmed Hashim, Tricia McKeever, Derek G Cook, John Britton, Jo Leonardi-Bee |
| Abstract |
Passive smoke exposure increases the risk of lower respiratory infection (LRI) in infants, but the extensive literature on this association has not been systematically reviewed for nearly ten years. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between passive smoking and LRI, and with diagnostic subcategories including bronchiolitis, in infants aged two years and under. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 310 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 105 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,867,520
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#170
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,443
of 246,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.