↓ Skip to main content

Pre-quitting nicotine replacement therapy: Findings from a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Tobacco Induced Diseases, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-quitting nicotine replacement therapy: Findings from a pilot study
Published in
Tobacco Induced Diseases, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1617-9625-3-2-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Bullen, Robyn Whittaker, Natalie Walker, Mark Wallace-Bell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Tobacco Induced Diseases
#136
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,207
of 154,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tobacco Induced Diseases
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them