↓ Skip to main content

Colorectal cancer incidences in Lynch syndrome: a comparison of results from the prospective lynch syndrome database and the international mismatch repair consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 264)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colorectal cancer incidences in Lynch syndrome: a comparison of results from the prospective lynch syndrome database and the international mismatch repair consortium
Published in
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13053-022-00241-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pål Møller, Toni Seppälä, James G. Dowty, Saskia Haupt, Mev Dominguez-Valentin, Lone Sunde, Inge Bernstein, Christoph Engel, Stefan Aretz, Maartje Nielsen, Gabriel Capella, Dafydd Gareth Evans, John Burn, Elke Holinski-Feder, Lucio Bertario, Bernardo Bonanni, Annika Lindblom, Zohar Levi, Finlay Macrae, Ingrid Winship, John-Paul Plazzer, Rolf Sijmons, Luigi Laghi, Adriana Della Valle, Karl Heinimann, Elizabeth Half, Francisco Lopez-Koestner, Karin Alvarez-Valenzuela, Rodney J. Scott, Lior Katz, Ido Laish, Elez Vainer, Carlos Alberto Vaccaro, Dirce Maria Carraro, Nathan Gluck, Naim Abu-Freha, Aine Stakelum, Rory Kennelly, Des Winter, Benedito Mauro Rossi, Marc Greenblatt, Mabel Bohorquez, Harsh Sheth, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Leonardo S. Lino-Silva, Karoline Horisberger, Carmen Portenkirchner, Ivana Nascimento, Norma Teresa Rossi, Leandro Apolinário da Silva, Huw Thomas, Attila Zaránd, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Kirsi Pylvänäinen, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Anna Lepisto, Päivi Peltomäki, Christina Therkildsen, Lars Joachim Lindberg, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Markus Loeffler, Nils Rahner, Verena Steinke-Lange, Wolff Schmiegel, Deepak Vangala, Claudia Perne, Robert Hüneburg, Aída Falcón de Vargas, Andrew Latchford, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Ann-Sofie Backman, Carmen Guillén-Ponce, Carrie Snyder, Charlotte K. Lautrup, David Amor, Edenir Palmero, Elena Stoffel, Floor Duijkers, Michael J. Hall, Heather Hampel, Heinric Williams, Henrik Okkels, Jan Lubiński, Jeanette Reece, Joanne Ngeow, Jose G. Guillem, Julie Arnold, Karin Wadt, Kevin Monahan, Leigha Senter, Lene J. Rasmussen, Liselotte P. van Hest, Luigi Ricciardiello, Maija R. J. Kohonen-Corish, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Melissa Southey, Melyssa Aronson, Mohd N. Zahary, N. Jewel Samadder, Nicola Poplawski, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Patrick J. Morrison, Paul James, Grant Lee, Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman, Ravindran Ankathil, Rish Pai, Robyn Ward, Susan Parry, Tadeusz Dębniak, Thomas John, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Trinidad Caldés, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Verónica Barca-Tierno, Pilar Garre, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Jürgen Weitz, Silke Redler, Reinhard Büttner, Vincent Heuveline, John L. Hopper, Aung Ko Win, Noralane Lindor, Steven Gallinger, Loïc Le Marchand, Polly A. Newcomb, Jane Figueiredo, Daniel D. Buchanan, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Sanne W. ten Broeke, Eivind Hovig, Sigve Nakken, Marta Pineda, Nuria Dueñas, Joan Brunet, Kate Green, Fiona Lalloo, Katie Newton, Emma J. Crosbie, Miriam Mints, Douglas Tjandra, Florencia Neffa, Patricia Esperon, Revital Kariv, Guy Rosner, Walter Hernán Pavicic, Pablo Kalfayan, Giovana Tardin Torrezan, Thiago Bassaneze, Claudia Martin, Gabriela Moslein, Aysel Ahadova, Matthias Kloor, Julian R. Sampson, Mark A. Jenkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,290,022
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#35
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,879
of 441,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.