↓ Skip to main content

The basophil activation test by flow cytometry: recent developments in clinical studies, standardization and emerging perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 212)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The basophil activation test by flow cytometry: recent developments in clinical studies, standardization and emerging perspectives
Published in
Clinical and Molecular Allergy, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1476-7961-3-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Radhia Boumiza, Anne-Lise Debard, Guillaume Monneret

Abstract

The diagnosis of immediate allergy is mainly based upon an evocative clinical history, positive skin tests (gold standard) and, if available, detection of specific IgE. In some complicated cases, functional in vitro tests are necessary. The general concept of those tests is to mimic in vitro the contact between allergens and circulating basophils. The first approach to basophil functional responses was the histamine release test but this has remained controversial due to insufficient sensitivity and specificity. During recent years an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that flow cytometry is a reliable tool for monitoring basophil activation upon allergen challenge by detecting surface expression of degranulation/activation markers (CD63 or CD203c). This article reviews the recent improvements to the basophil activation test made possible by flow cytometry, focusing on the use of anti-CRTH2/DP2 antibodies for basophil recognition. On the basis of a new triple staining protocol, the basophil activation test has become a standardized tool for in vitro diagnosis of immediate allergy. It is also suitable for pharmacological studies on non-purified human basophils. Multicenter studies are now required for its clinical assessment in large patient populations and to define the cut-off values for clinical decision-making.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Argentina 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 99 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,660,856
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#32
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,901
of 56,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them