You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) treatment for moderate-to-severe ARDS in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04158-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khalid Al Sulaiman, Ghazwa B. Korayem, Ali F. Altebainawi, Shmeylan Al Harbi, Abdulrahman Alissa, Abdullah Alharthi, Raed Kensara, Amjaad Alfahed, Ramesh Vishwakarma, Hussain Al Haji, Naif Almohaimid, Omar Al Zumai, Fahad Alrubayan, Abdulmajid Asiri, Nasser Alkahtani, Abdulaziz Alolayan, Samiah Alsohimi, Nawal Melibari, Alaa Almagthali, Seba Aljahdali, Abeer A. Alenazi, Alawi S. Alsaeedi, Ghassan Al Ghamdi, Omar Al Faris, Joud Alqahtani, Jalal Al Qahtani, Khalid A. Alshammari, Khalil I. Alshammari, Ohoud Aljuhani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,514,411
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,338
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,168
of 439,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.