Title |
Testing for carryover effects after cessation of treatments: a design approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0191-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Gwynn Sturdevant, Thomas Lumley |
Abstract |
Recently, trials addressing noisy measurements with diagnosis occurring by exceeding thresholds (such as diabetes and hypertension) have been published which attempt to measure carryover - the impact that treatment has on an outcome after cessation. The design of these trials has been criticised and simulations have been conducted which suggest that the parallel-designs used are not adequate to test this hypothesis; two solutions are that either a differing parallel-design or a cross-over design could allow for diagnosis of carryover. We undertook a systematic simulation study to determine the ability of a cross-over or a parallel-group trial design to detect carryover effects on incident hypertension in a population with prehypertension. We simulated blood pressure and focused on varying criteria to diagnose systolic hypertension. Using the difference in cumulative incidence hypertension to analyse parallel-group or cross-over trials resulted in none of the designs having acceptable Type I error rate. Under the null hypothesis of no carryover the difference is well above the nominal 5 % error rate. When a treatment is effective during the intervention period, reliable testing for a carryover effect is difficult. Neither parallel-group nor cross-over designs using the difference in cumulative incidence appear to be a feasible approach. Future trials should ensure their design and analysis is validated by simulation. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |