You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overall survival in patients with re-excision of positive microscopic margins of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma operated outside of a reference center: a nationwide cohort analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francois Gouin, Eberhard Stoeckle, Charles Honoré, Mickael Ropars, Mehrdad Jafari, Jean Camille Mattei, Alexandre Rochwerger, Sébastien Carrere, Denis Waast, Gwenaël Ferron, Jean-Christophe Machiavello, Philippe Anract, Frédéric Marchal, François Sirveaux, Oren Marco, Jérôme Guiramand, Brice Paquette, Antonio Di Marco, Sylvain Causeret, Jean-Marc Guilloit, Pauline Soibinet, Dimitri Tzanis, Pierre Gimbergues, Fabrice Fiorenza, Franck Dujardin, Louis R. Le Nail, Jean-Christophe Ruzic, Claire Chemin-Airiau, Magali Morelle, Pierre Meeus, Marie Karanian, François Le Loarer, Gualter Vaz, Jean-Yves Blay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 31% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,146,388
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#674
of 8,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,012
of 432,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#6
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,796 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.