You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How a generally well-accepted measles vaccine mandate may lead to inequities and decreased vaccine uptake: a preregistered survey study in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-14075-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Neufeind, Nora Schmid-Küpke, Eva Rehfuess, Cornelia Betsch, Ole Wichmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 17 | 46% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,558,390
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,737
of 16,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,414
of 434,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#39
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.