You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hand hygiene improvement of individual healthcare workers: results of the multicentre PROHIBIT study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13756-022-01148-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tjallie van der Kooi, Hugo Sax, Hajo Grundmann, Didier Pittet, Sabine de Greeff, Jaap van Dissel, Lauren Clack, Albert W. Wu, Judith Davitt, Sofia Kostourou, Alison Maguinness, Anna Michalik, Viorica Nedelcu, Márta Patyi, Janja Perme Hajdinjak, Milena Prosen, David Tellez, Éva Varga, Fani Veini, Mirosław Ziętkiewicz, Walter Zingg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 68% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,790,447
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#338
of 1,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,617
of 440,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.