You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Support for multiple classes of local expression clusters in Drosophila melanogaster, but no evidence for gene order conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia C Weber, Laurence D Hurst |
Abstract |
Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 50 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
Researcher | 15 | 25% |
Professor | 8 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 62% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 21% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,752,529
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,149
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,740
of 128,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.