↓ Skip to main content

Adaptation of mammalian host-pathogen interactions in a changing arctic environment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptation of mammalian host-pathogen interactions in a changing arctic environment
Published in
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1751-0147-53-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karsten Hueffer, Todd M O'Hara, Erich H Follmann

Abstract

Many arctic mammals are adapted to live year-round in extreme environments with low winter temperatures and great seasonal variations in key variables (e.g. sunlight, food, temperature, moisture). The interaction between hosts and pathogens in high northern latitudes is not very well understood with respect to intra-annual cycles (seasons). The annual cycles of interacting pathogen and host biology is regulated in part by highly synchronized temperature and photoperiod changes during seasonal transitions (e.g., freezeup and breakup). With a warming climate, only one of these key biological cues will undergo drastic changes, while the other will remain fixed. This uncoupling can theoretically have drastic consequences on host-pathogen interactions. These poorly understood cues together with a changing climate by itself will challenge host populations that are adapted to pathogens under the historic and current climate regime. We will review adaptations of both host and pathogens to the extreme conditions at high latitudes and explore some potential consequences of rapid changes in the Arctic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Other 8 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2011.
All research outputs
#5,423,170
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#95
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,786
of 119,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.