You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-022-01183-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faith Chesire, Marlyn Ochieng, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Matt Oxman, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Simon Lewin, Nelson K. Sewankambo, Margaret Kaseje, Andrew D. Oxman, Sarah Rosenbaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,992,448
of 23,548,905 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#447
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,566
of 442,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#18
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,548,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.