↓ Skip to main content

Statistics teaching in medical school: Opinions of practising doctors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistics teaching in medical school: Opinions of practising doctors
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-10-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Miles, Gill M Price, Louise Swift, Lee Shepstone, Sam J Leinster

Abstract

The General Medical Council expects UK medical graduates to gain some statistical knowledge during their undergraduate education; but provides no specific guidance as to amount, content or teaching method. Published work on statistics teaching for medical undergraduates has been dominated by medical statisticians, with little input from the doctors who will actually be using this knowledge and these skills after graduation. Furthermore, doctor's statistical training needs may have changed due to advances in information technology and the increasing importance of evidence-based medicine. Thus there exists a need to investigate the views of practising medical doctors as to the statistical training required for undergraduate medical students, based on their own use of these skills in daily practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 46 35%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 41%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Mathematics 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,998,719
of 24,612,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#669
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,352
of 104,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,612,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.