You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are "teaching the teachers" courses in evidence based medicine evaluated? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-10-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacek Walczak, Anna Kaleta, Elżbieta Gabryś, Krzysztof Kloc, Shakila Thangaratinam, Gemma Barnfield, Susanne Weinbrenner, Berit Meyerrose, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Andrea R Horvath, Gianni Zanrei, Regina Kunz, Katja Suter, Bernard Burnand, Chantal Arditi, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Gee Harry, Ben WJ Mol, Khalid S Khan |
| Abstract |
Teaching of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become widespread in medical education. Teaching the teachers (TTT) courses address the increased teaching demand and the need to improve effectiveness of EBM teaching. We conducted a systematic review of assessment tools for EBM TTT courses. To summarise and appraise existing assessment methods for teaching the teachers courses in EBM by a systematic review. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 37% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2010.
All research outputs
#4,655,198
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#792
of 3,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,517
of 98,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.