You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Imaging, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2342-8-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mette Munk Jensen, Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen, Tina Binderup, Andreas Kjær |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 24% |
| Researcher | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 63 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 10% |
| Engineering | 20 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,338,541
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#44
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,637
of 91,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them