↓ Skip to main content

Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 619)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-8-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Munk Jensen, Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen, Tina Binderup, Andreas Kjær

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 24%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 55 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 63 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 10%
Engineering 20 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 62 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,338,541
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#44
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,637
of 91,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them