You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Doppler study of portal vein and renal venous velocity predict the appropriate fluid response to diuretic in ICU: a prospective observational echocardiographic evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04180-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Pierre-Alain Bahr, Stefan Andrei, Bogdan A. Popescu, Vincenza Caruso, Paul-Michel Mertes, Vivien Berthoud, Maxime Nguyen, Belaid Bouhemad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 20 | 15% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Scientists | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#505,139
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#301
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,660
of 442,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.