You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical evidence of study design biases in nutrition randomised controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02540-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Stadelmaier, Isabelle Roux, Maria Petropoulou, Lukas Schwingshackl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Poland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,158,158
of 23,661,575 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,597
of 3,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,080
of 441,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#109
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,661,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.