You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and validation of a pyroptosis-related prognostic signature for thyroid cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell International, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12935-021-02231-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pu Wu, Jinyuan Shi, Wei Sun, Hao Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,930,489
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#368
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,258
of 435,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#5
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.