You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The case against censoring of progression-free survival in cancer clinical trials – A pandemic shutdown as an illustration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01731-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corinne Jamoul, Laurence Collette, Elisabeth Coart, Koenraad D’Hollander, Tomasz Burzykowski, Everardo D. Saad, Marc Buyse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 43% |
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,340,838
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#706
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,702
of 442,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.