↓ Skip to main content

A rapid and robust method of identifying transformed Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings following floral dip transformation

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
858 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rapid and robust method of identifying transformed Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings following floral dip transformation
Published in
Plant Methods, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-2-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel J Harrison, Ellie K Mott, Kate Parsley, Sue Aspinall, John C Gray, Amanda Cottage

Abstract

The floral dip method of transformation by immersion of inflorescences in a suspension of Agrobacterium is the method of choice for Arabidopsis transformation. The presence of a marker, usually antibiotic- or herbicide-resistance, allows identification of transformed seedlings from untransformed seedlings. Seedling selection is a lengthy process which does not always lead to easily identifiable transformants. Selection for kanamycin-, phosphinothricin- and hygromycin B-resistance commonly takes 7-10 d and high seedling density and fungal contamination may result in failure to recover transformants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 858 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Argentina 3 <1%
Czechia 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Other 21 2%
Unknown 805 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 240 28%
Researcher 149 17%
Student > Master 125 15%
Student > Bachelor 85 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 5%
Other 110 13%
Unknown 102 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 546 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 172 20%
Environmental Science 8 <1%
Computer Science 4 <1%
Chemistry 4 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 110 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,455,485
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#118
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,073
of 76,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.