You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo fluorescence imaging: success in preclinical imaging paves the way for clinical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01648-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Refaat, May Lin Yap, Geoffrey Pietersz, Aidan Patrick Garing Walsh, Johannes Zeller, Blanca del Rosal, Xiaowei Wang, Karlheinz Peter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Poland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,394,404
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#124
of 1,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,173
of 435,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#9
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.