You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COVID-19 vaccine update: vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2 variants, boosters, adverse effects, and immune correlates of protection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-022-00853-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei-Yu Chi, Yen-Der Li, Hsin-Che Huang, Timothy En Haw Chan, Sih-Yao Chow, Jun-Han Su, Louise Ferrall, Chien-Fu Hung, T.-C. Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 89 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 90 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,179,328
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#45
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,924
of 441,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.