↓ Skip to main content

Visualising biological data: a semantic approach to tool and database integration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
14 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visualising biological data: a semantic approach to tool and database integration
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-s6-s19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Pettifer, David Thorne, Philip McDermott, James Marsh, Alice Villéger, Douglas B Kell, Teresa K Attwood

Abstract

In the biological sciences, the need to analyse vast amounts of information has become commonplace. Such large-scale analyses often involve drawing together data from a variety of different databases, held remotely on the internet or locally on in-house servers. Supporting these tasks are ad hoc collections of data-manipulation tools, scripting languages and visualisation software, which are often combined in arcane ways to create cumbersome systems that have been customized for a particular purpose, and are consequently not readily adaptable to other uses. For many day-to-day bioinformatics tasks, the sizes of current databases, and the scale of the analyses necessary, now demand increasing levels of automation; nevertheless, the unique experience and intuition of human researchers is still required to interpret the end results in any meaningful biological way. Putting humans in the loop requires tools to support real-time interaction with these vast and complex data-sets. Numerous tools do exist for this purpose, but many do not have optimal interfaces, most are effectively isolated from other tools and databases owing to incompatible data formats, and many have limited real-time performance when applied to realistically large data-sets: much of the user's cognitive capacity is therefore focused on controlling the software and manipulating esoteric file formats rather than on performing the research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 8%
United States 4 4%
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 83 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 17 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Computer Science 28 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 7 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,714,904
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#372
of 7,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,879
of 99,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.