↓ Skip to main content

Linking genes to literature: text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
465 Mendeley
citeulike
35 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking genes to literature: text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Krallinger, Alfonso Valencia, Lynette Hirschman

Abstract

Efficient access to information contained in online scientific literature collections is essential for life science research, playing a crucial role from the initial stage of experiment planning to the final interpretation and communication of the results. The biological literature also constitutes the main information source for manual literature curation used by expert-curated databases. Following the increasing popularity of web-based applications for analyzing biological data, new text-mining and information extraction strategies are being implemented. These systems exploit existing regularities in natural language to extract biologically relevant information from electronic texts automatically. The aim of the BioCreative challenge is to promote the development of such tools and to provide insight into their performance. This review presents a general introduction to the main characteristics and applications of currently available text-mining systems for life sciences in terms of the following: the type of biological information demands being addressed; the level of information granularity of both user queries and results; and the features and methods commonly exploited by these applications. The current trend in biomedical text mining points toward an increasing diversification in terms of application types and techniques, together with integration of domain-specific resources such as ontologies. Additional descriptions of some of the systems discussed here are available on the internet http://zope.bioinfo.cnio.es/bionlp_tools/.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 28 6%
United Kingdom 9 2%
Germany 6 1%
Mexico 5 1%
Spain 5 1%
Belgium 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 376 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 98 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 19%
Student > Master 77 17%
Professor 34 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 32 7%
Other 105 23%
Unknown 29 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 29%
Computer Science 109 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 7%
Social Sciences 30 6%
Other 86 18%
Unknown 42 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,227,746
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,638
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,422
of 95,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.