You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of rarity in NICE’s health technology appraisals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01845-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Clarke, Michelle Ellis, Jack Brownrigg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,438,001
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#148
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,289
of 442,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#7
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.