You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A practical guideline for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram in the congenital heart disease patient: consensus recommendations from the British Society of Echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Echo Research & Practice, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s44156-022-00006-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Corbett, Jan Forster, Wendy Gamlin, Nuno Duarte, Owen Burgess, Allan Harkness, Wei Li, John Simpson, Radwa Bedair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 39% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 20% |
| Scientists | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 56% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#705,089
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#9
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,647
of 443,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them