↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic risk assessment model and drug sensitivity analysis of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) based on immune-related lncRNA pairs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic risk assessment model and drug sensitivity analysis of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) based on immune-related lncRNA pairs
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12859-022-04969-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zezhou Hao, Pengchen Liang, Changyu He, Shuang Sha, Ziyuan Yang, Yixin Liu, Junfeng Shi, Zhenggang Zhu, Qing Chang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,446,847
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,162
of 7,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,336
of 434,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#68
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.