You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical and neurocognitive outcome in symptomatic isovaleric acidemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah C Grünert, Udo Wendel, Martin Lindner, Michael Leichsenring, K Otfried Schwab, Jerry Vockley, Willy Lehnert, Regina Ensenauer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,377,278
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#489
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,614
of 257,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.