↓ Skip to main content

Three dimensional shape comparison of flexible proteins using the local-diameter descriptor

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three dimensional shape comparison of flexible proteins using the local-diameter descriptor
Published in
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6807-9-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Fang, Yu-Shen Liu, Karthik Ramani

Abstract

Techniques for inferring the functions of the protein by comparing their shape similarity have been receiving a lot of attention. Proteins are functional units and their shape flexibility occupies an essential role in various biological processes. Several shape descriptors have demonstrated the capability of protein shape comparison by treating them as rigid bodies. But this may give rise to an incorrect comparison of flexible protein shapes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 37%
Researcher 7 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2009.
All research outputs
#6,486,225
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#204
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,917
of 102,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.