You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc7129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maurizio Cecconi, Andrew Rhodes, Jan Poloniecki, Giorgio Della Rocca, R Michael Grounds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 20% |
Researcher | 35 | 19% |
Other | 32 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
Other | 38 | 21% |
Unknown | 17 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 61% |
Engineering | 15 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6,053
of 6,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,861
of 190,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.