You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability and validity of the Japanese movement imagery questionnaire-revised second version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-022-06220-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hideki Nakano, Mizuki Tachibana, Nao Fujita, Shun Sawai, Shoya Fujikawa, Ryosuke Yamamoto, Shin Murata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,908,131
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,718
of 4,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,703
of 445,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.