↓ Skip to main content

Computational phenotyping of obstructive airway diseases: protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational phenotyping of obstructive airway diseases: protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-022-02078-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muwada Bashir Awad Bashir, Rani Basna, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Helena Backman, Anne Lindberg, Linda Ekerljung, Malin Axelsson, Linnea Hedman, Lowie Vanfleteren, Bo Lundbäck, Eva Rönmark, Bright I. Nwaru

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,958,921
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,005
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,717
of 441,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#25
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.