You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of saliva and nasal rapid antigen SARS-CoV-2 self-testing: cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02603-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ewoud Schuit, Roderick P. Venekamp, Irene K. Veldhuijzen, Wouter van den Bijllaardt, Suzan D. Pas, Joep J. J. M. Stohr, Esther B. Lodder, Marloes Hellwich, Richard Molenkamp, Zsofia Igloi, Constantijn Wijers, Irene H. Vroom, Carla R. S. Nagel-Imming, Wanda G. H. Han, Jan A. J. W. Kluytmans, Susan van den Hof, Janneke H. H. M. van de Wijgert, Karel G. M. Moons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,697,501
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,785
of 3,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,332
of 434,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#109
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.