↓ Skip to main content

Virtual and augmented reality in critical care medicine: the patient’s, clinician’s, and researcher’s perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virtual and augmented reality in critical care medicine: the patient’s, clinician’s, and researcher’s perspective
Published in
Critical Care, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04202-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Romano Bruno, Georg Wolff, Bernhard Wernly, Maryna Masyuk, Kerstin Piayda, Susannah Leaver, Ralf Erkens, Daniel Oehler, Shazia Afzal, Houtan Heidari, Malte Kelm, Christian Jung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Researcher 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Student > Master 8 4%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 100 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Engineering 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 103 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,373,316
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,185
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,965
of 440,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#36
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.