You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing trial representativeness using serious adverse events: an observational analysis using aggregate and individual-level data from clinical trials and routine healthcare data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02594-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Anoop S. V. Shah, Laurie J. Hannigan, Sarah H. Wild, Bruce Guthrie, Frances S. Mair, Sofia Dias, Nicky J. Welton, David A. McAllister |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,152,861
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,923
of 3,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,539
of 437,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#107
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.