↓ Skip to main content

Change of water consumption and its potential influential factors in Shanghai: A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Change of water consumption and its potential influential factors in Shanghai: A cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanyi Chen, Yaying Zhang, Linlin Ma, Fangmin Liu, Weiwei Zheng, Qinfeng Shen, Hongmei Zhang, Xiao Wei, Dajun Tian, Gengsheng He, Weidong Qu

Abstract

Different water choices affect access to drinking water with different quality. Previous studies suggested social-economic status may affect the choice of domestic drinking water. The aim of this study is to investigate whether recent social economic changes in China affect residents' drinking water choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Environmental Science 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,176,369
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,214
of 16,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,206
of 168,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#233
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.