You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alternating between active and passive facilitator roles in simulated scenarios: a qualitative study of nursing students’ perceptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00233-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hilde Solli, Thor Arne Haukedal, Sissel Iren Eikeland Husebø, Inger Åse Reierson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,595,608
of 24,975,845 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#168
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,521
of 435,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.