↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1214-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celestin Danwang, Jean Joel Bigna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 18 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#19,095,446
of 23,661,575 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,833
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,213
of 361,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#64
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,661,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.