↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT-162b2 vaccine and the ChAdOx1 vaccine for solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT-162b2 vaccine and the ChAdOx1 vaccine for solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12879-022-07764-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aziza A. Ajlan, Tariq Ali, Hassan Aleid, Khalid Almeshari, Edward DeVol, Morad Ahmed Alkaff, Layal Fajji, Ali Alali, Dani Halabi, Sahar Althuwaidi, Saad Alghamdi, Asad Ullah, Abdulrahman Alrajhi, Khalid Bzeizi, Reem Almaghrabi, Kris Ann Hervera Marquez, Bilal Elmikkaoui, Eid Albogumi, Haifa Aldakhil, Moheeb Al-Awwami, Dieter C. Broering

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Unspecified 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,424,842
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,202
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,257
of 443,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#70
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.