You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When Indian crabs were not yet Asian - biogeographic evidence for Eocene proximity of India and Southeast Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-10-287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Klaus, Christoph D Schubart, Bruno Streit, Markus Pfenninger |
| Abstract |
The faunal and floral relationship of northward-drifting India with its neighboring continents is of general biogeographic interest as an important driver of regional biodiversity. However, direct biogeographic connectivity of India and Southeast Asia during the Cenozoic remains largely unexplored. We investigate timing, direction and mechanisms of faunal exchange between India and Southeast Asia, based on a molecular phylogeny, molecular clock-derived time estimates and biogeographic reconstructions of the Asian freshwater crab family Gecarcinucidae. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 29% |
| Researcher | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,228,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,069
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,258
of 106,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#17
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.