You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remote working in public involvement: findings from a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-022-00396-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Jones, Lucy Frith, Mark Gabbay, Naheed Tahir, Muhammad Hossain, Mark Goodall, Katie Bristow, Shaima Hassan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,594,444
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#296
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,335
of 445,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.