You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How a thrombectomy service can reduce hospital deficit: a cost-effectiveness study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-022-00395-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iris Q. Grunwald, Viola Wagner, Anna Podlasek, Gouri Koduri, Paul Guyler, Stephen Gerry, Sweni Shah, Horst Sievert, Aarti Sharma, Shrey Mathur, Klaus Fassbender, Kaveh Shariat, Graeme Houston, Avinash Kanodia, Silke Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
India | 1 | 11% |
Vietnam | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,069,315
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#190
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,890
of 442,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.