You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel application of one-step pooled molecular testing and maximum likelihood approaches to estimate the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia among rapid diagnostic test negative samples in western Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04323-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica P. Shah, Winnie Chebore, Robert H. Lyles, Kephas Otieno, Zhiyong Zhou, Mateusz Plucinski, Lance A. Waller, Wycliffe Odongo, Kim A. Lindblade, Simon Kariuki, Aaron M. Samuels, Meghna Desai, Rebecca M. Mitchell, Ya Ping Shi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,416,706
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,390
of 5,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,467
of 442,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#71
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.