You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploring the utility and acceptability of Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as a novel intervention for the improvement of colorectal Cancer (CRC) surveillance in individuals with lynch syndrome (FIT for lynch study): a single-arm, prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-022-10217-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Lincoln, Sally Benton, Carolyn Piggott, Bernard V. North, Jane Rigney, Caroline Young, Philip Quirke, Peter Sasieni, Kevin J. Monahan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
Ireland | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,677,162
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,667
of 8,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,795
of 435,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#23
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.