You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The view of Hong Kong parents on secondary use of dried blood spots in newborn screening program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00839-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. L. Hui, E. A.S. Nelson, H. B. Deng, T. Y. Leung, C. H. Ho, J. S.C. Chong, G. P.G. Fung, J. Hui, H. S. Lam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,820,927
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#490
of 996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,524
of 441,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.