↓ Skip to main content

Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages
Published in
BMC Biology, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-6-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph W Brown, Joshua S Rest, Jaime García-Moreno, Michael D Sorenson, David P Mindell

Abstract

Determining an absolute timescale for avian evolutionary history has proven contentious. The two sources of information available, paleontological data and inference from extant molecular genetic sequences (colloquially, 'rocks' and 'clocks'), have appeared irreconcilable; the fossil record supports a Cenozoic origin for most modern lineages, whereas molecular genetic estimates suggest that these same lineages originated deep within the Cretaceous and survived the K-Pg (Cretaceous-Paleogene; formerly Cretaceous-Tertiary or K-T) mass-extinction event. These two sources of data therefore appear to support fundamentally different models of avian evolution. The paradox has been speculated to reflect deficiencies in the fossil record, unrecognized biases in the treatment of genetic data or both. Here we attempt to explore uncertainty and limit bias entering into molecular divergence time estimates through: (i) improved taxon (n = 135) and character (n = 4594 bp mtDNA) sampling; (ii) inclusion of multiple cladistically tested internal fossil calibration points (n = 18); (iii) correction for lineage-specific rate heterogeneity using a variety of methods (n = 5); (iv) accommodation of uncertainty in tree topology; and (v) testing for possible effects of episodic evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Brazil 5 2%
Chile 5 2%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 274 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 6%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 20 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 204 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 8%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 24 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,192,730
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#16
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,537
of 173,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.