You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2191-1991-4-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inna Dabisch, Jürgen Dethling, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios, Melanie Drechsler, Daniel Kalanovic, Peter Kaskel, Frank Langer, Jörg Ruof, Thorsten Ruppert, Daniel Wirth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,985,616
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#48
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,895
of 307,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them